The Commission that Guarantees the Transparency of LACNIC's Election Processes

This year was marked by the COVID-19 pandemic, which meant that LACNIC's Electoral Commission had to face a two-fold challenge: holding periodic virtual meetings despite the three different time zones of the Commission's five members and overseeing the usual bylaws-mandated elections plus three additional election processes for the LACNIC community.

Neither the increased workload nor the health emergency kept Marcelo Corradini (Brazil), Carolina Cofré Fernández (Chile), Horacio Tedesco (Argentina), Nancy Julia Cordova Gamarra (Peru) and Vivian Valverde (Costa Rica) from stepping up their efforts and successfully carrying out the work of the Electoral Commission.

This difficult year gave the members of the Commission the chance to prove their commitment, considering that, in addition to their usual tasks, they had to oversee three community election processes without the possibility of meeting face to face to discuss and come to an agreement.

It should be noted that the Electoral commission is made up of community representatives and oversees the election processes to appoint the organization's authorities.

LACNIC Member spoke with the members of the Commission and asked them to share some of the details of their work during this unique year.

What major challenges did LACNIC's Electoral Commission face this year? 

Because of the pandemic, this year we were unable to meet in person as we did in 2019. Meeting face to face allowed us multiple benefits, such as sharing our experiences as well as adjusting and coordinating our work methods and points of view with LACNIC staff members. During the pandemic, one of our challenges was to coordinate and hold virtual meetings, as remote work increased significantly all over the world and work days were extended beyond normal hours.

Considering that 2020 was the first year during which the Commission audited community processes, what challenges did you encounter?

Learning all about the new modalities for the ASO and RC elections was undoubtedly one of the challenges we faced. Nevertheless, we didn’t encounter any problems during the election of the chair, which was the first of the processes in which we were involved. The rules specified by the Board were followed and the procedure used was the same as for bylaws-mandated elections. This allowed us to obtain a very efficient result, as we were able to audit the process in the sense that candidates met the requirements, that the Board's recommendations regarding electoral propaganda and mass messaging were followed, and that there no incompatibilities were found in the candidates.

What has the Commission's work been like during the pandemic?

As a result of the pandemic, we had to coordinate additional meetings with the staff – with all the difficulties and challenges this implied as we mentioned earlier – to clarify doubts regarding the community elections. This could have been easily solved by meeting face to face with the staff.

How relevant is the Electoral Commission for LACNIC members and for the community in general? What are the prospects for the Commission's work during 2021?

1. Given the powers and responsibilities of the Electoral Commission, it is very important for members and for the community as a whole, as it supervises and guarantees the transparency of the elections, overseeing and certifying that conditions and rules are met throughout the process. It also organizes the vote count and determines election results. The Commission can act when a complaint is submitted. It has the power to summon an extraordinary assembly in case of serious irregularities and may investigate and decide on alleged irregularities of the members of the Board of Directors and the Fiscal Commission.
2. Providing continuity to the activities we have already been assigned and collaborating in whatever way we can to adjust and improve the procedures, coordinating and aligning our efforts with members of the LACNIC staff in future face-to-face meetings.